<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Brother MFC-420CN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://homeofficeblues.com/3/review-brother-mfc-420cn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://homeofficeblues.com/3/review-brother-mfc-420cn/</link>
	<description>Information, resources and humor to help you beat the home office blues.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:26:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://homeofficeblues.com/3/review-brother-mfc-420cn/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homeofficeblues.smartfaremedia.com/?p=3#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Good little printer, but their are newer models that are superior. It does feel cheap but i haven&#039;t had one break on me.

Also if you intend to print 50+ pages at a time, don&#039;t bother with these little printers because the paper tray is rather small. Same goes for if you print many different formats constantly. It is a very slow process to load paper and change between different paper sizes. I would not recommend this printer to someone who prints to a variety of different sized media on a daily basis.

The scanner is very slow on this model. I have also have a 465CN the scanner runs at a good pace.

Make sure you buy the cheap compatible ink if you intend to print on a daily basis. No sense in pissing your money away. You should always recycle your ink cartridges, if you don&#039;t know where to recycle them, then get the brother ink cartridges because you can mail them in at no cost to be recycled.

All in all a good cheap printer for what it does</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good little printer, but their are newer models that are superior. It does feel cheap but i haven&#8217;t had one break on me.</p>
<p>Also if you intend to print 50+ pages at a time, don&#8217;t bother with these little printers because the paper tray is rather small. Same goes for if you print many different formats constantly. It is a very slow process to load paper and change between different paper sizes. I would not recommend this printer to someone who prints to a variety of different sized media on a daily basis.</p>
<p>The scanner is very slow on this model. I have also have a 465CN the scanner runs at a good pace.</p>
<p>Make sure you buy the cheap compatible ink if you intend to print on a daily basis. No sense in pissing your money away. You should always recycle your ink cartridges, if you don&#8217;t know where to recycle them, then get the brother ink cartridges because you can mail them in at no cost to be recycled.</p>
<p>All in all a good cheap printer for what it does</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://homeofficeblues.com/3/review-brother-mfc-420cn/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 01:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homeofficeblues.smartfaremedia.com/?p=3#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Pure piece of shit this thing. I mean I guess it functions fine, it prints things and scans things. I really liked that it has a document feeder on the scanner. In fact I bought it just as a scanner. And I never printed anything on it. Which is why I was surprised when it started beeping at me that it was running low on ink. Apparently it had been &#039;cleaning&#039; the heads, which I guess means dumping the ink into a sponge somewhere. So then when I wanted to use it to print I went to take the paper tray out and it was like pulling a car uphill. It was absolutely impossible. I broke the tray trying to take it out. Go ahead and buy it for the scanner, but also be sure to buy a separate printer if you want to have the option of ever opening the paper tray.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pure piece of shit this thing. I mean I guess it functions fine, it prints things and scans things. I really liked that it has a document feeder on the scanner. In fact I bought it just as a scanner. And I never printed anything on it. Which is why I was surprised when it started beeping at me that it was running low on ink. Apparently it had been &#8216;cleaning&#8217; the heads, which I guess means dumping the ink into a sponge somewhere. So then when I wanted to use it to print I went to take the paper tray out and it was like pulling a car uphill. It was absolutely impossible. I broke the tray trying to take it out. Go ahead and buy it for the scanner, but also be sure to buy a separate printer if you want to have the option of ever opening the paper tray.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hob</title>
		<link>http://homeofficeblues.com/3/review-brother-mfc-420cn/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Hob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2005 01:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homeofficeblues.smartfaremedia.com/?p=3#comment-6</guid>
		<description>JJ,
Multifunction devices are good for people that do not need dedicated full time devices for each function. If your business depends on scanning, I would not recommend any multifunction device. Get a dedicated scanner. It will do what you want when you want it and will likely be quicker, better, easier, etc. I don&#039;t need a full time dedicated scanner, printer, or fax so one device that does all three works great for me. Good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JJ,<br />
Multifunction devices are good for people that do not need dedicated full time devices for each function. If your business depends on scanning, I would not recommend any multifunction device. Get a dedicated scanner. It will do what you want when you want it and will likely be quicker, better, easier, etc. I don&#8217;t need a full time dedicated scanner, printer, or fax so one device that does all three works great for me. Good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greee</title>
		<link>http://homeofficeblues.com/3/review-brother-mfc-420cn/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>greee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 01:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homeofficeblues.smartfaremedia.com/?p=3#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Boy that sure is cheap!! I have a separate Scanner, Fax, and printer. . .oh, what money I could have saved if I had bothered to do a little research at the beginning instead of impulse buying as each need arose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boy that sure is cheap!! I have a separate Scanner, Fax, and printer. . .oh, what money I could have saved if I had bothered to do a little research at the beginning instead of impulse buying as each need arose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>http://homeofficeblues.com/3/review-brother-mfc-420cn/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2005 01:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://homeofficeblues.smartfaremedia.com/?p=3#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Dear Home Office Blues,

Might I suggest that you are &quot;blue&quot; because of the slow performance of your Brother MFC. I too purchased a similar machine, the laser printer version, for my home-based business which relies heavily on scanning documents.

This machine is now relegated to my &#039;back-up&#039; category due to its sluggish scanning speed. Set-up and go was quick and easy, but the scanning speed left much to be desired.

None-the-less, thanks for the review and I&#039;ll check in for more info at the Home office Blues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Home Office Blues,</p>
<p>Might I suggest that you are &#8220;blue&#8221; because of the slow performance of your Brother MFC. I too purchased a similar machine, the laser printer version, for my home-based business which relies heavily on scanning documents.</p>
<p>This machine is now relegated to my &#8216;back-up&#8217; category due to its sluggish scanning speed. Set-up and go was quick and easy, but the scanning speed left much to be desired.</p>
<p>None-the-less, thanks for the review and I&#8217;ll check in for more info at the Home office Blues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
